Explaining political judgement / Perri 6.
نوع المادة : نصالناشر:Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011وصف:ix, 344 pages : illustrations ; 24 cmنوع المحتوى:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9781107009226 (hbk)
- 1107009227 (hbk)
- JA71 A14 2011
نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
كتاب | UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | JA71 A14 2011 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000404898 | ||
كتاب | UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | JA71 A14 2011 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.2 | المتاح | 30010000404897 |
Browsing UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات shelves, Shelving location: General Collection | المجموعات العامة إغلاق مستعرض الرف(يخفي مستعرض الرف)
JA70 .U23 2013 الحقيقة المغيبة / | JA70 .U23 2013 الحقيقة المغيبة / | JA70 .Z37 1956 خطاب إلى جندى أمريكى / | JA71 A14 2011 Explaining political judgement / | JA71 A14 2011 Explaining political judgement / | JA71 A22 النظرية السياسية المعاصرة: دراسة في النماذج و النظريات التي قدمت لفهم و تحليل عالم السياسة / | JA71 A229 2011 مبادئ العلوم السياسية / |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-338) and index.
1. On political judgement -- 2. The need for richer explanation -- 3. A Durkheimian theoretical framework -- 4. October 1962, before and after -- 5. The Khrushchev regime -- 6. The Kennedy administration -- 7. The Castro revolutionary r{u2967}ime -- 8. Implications -- 9. Coda.
What is political judgement? Why do politicians exhibit such contrasting thought styles in making decisions, even when they agree ideologically? What happens when governments with contrasting thought styles have to deal with each other? In this book Perri 6 presents a fresh, rigorous explanatory theory of judgment, its varieties and its consequences, drawing upon Durkheim and Douglas. He argues that policy makers will understand - and misunderstand - their problems and choices in ways that reproduce their own social organisation. This theory is developed by using the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 as an extended case study, examining the decision-making of the Kennedy, Castro and Khrushchev regimes. Explaining political judgment is the first comprehensive study to show what a neo-Durkheimian institutional approach can offer to political science and to the social sciences generally.