The 9/11 effect : comparative counter-terrorism / Kent Roach.
نوع المادة :
نصالناشر:New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011وصف:xiv, 477 pages ; 23 cmنوع المحتوى:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9781107006164 (hbk)
- 1107006163 (hbk)
- 9780521185059
- 052118505X
- HV6432.7 R57 2011
| نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
كتاب
|
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | HV6432.7 R57 2011 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000402298 | ||
|
كتاب
|
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | HV6432.7 R57 2011 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.2 | المتاح | 30010000402297 |
Browsing UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات shelves, Shelving location: General Collection | المجموعات العامة إغلاق مستعرض الرف(يخفي مستعرض الرف)
| HV6432.7 R35 2003 The terror enigma : 911 and the Israeli connection / | HV6432.7 R48 2003 Rethink : cause and consequences of September 11 / | HV6432.7 R48 2003 Rethink : cause and consequences of September 11 / | HV6432.7 R57 2011 The 9/11 effect : comparative counter-terrorism / | HV6432.7 R57 2011 The 9/11 effect : comparative counter-terrorism / | HV6432.7 R6 2003 September 11 : consequences for Canada / | HV6432.7 R6 2003 September 11 : consequences for Canada / |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Introduction; 2. The United Nations responds; 3. Countries that did not immediately respond; 4. The United States responds: executive power and extra-legalism; 5. The United Kingdom responds: a legislative war on terrorism; 6. Australia responds: hyper legislation; 7. Canada responds: immigration, inquiries and human security; 8. Conclusions.
This book examines the responses of the United Nations, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada responded to 9/11. It also examines how Egypt, Syria, Israel, Singapore and Indonesia had to do comparatively little to respond. The book provides a creitical take on how the United Nations promoted terrorism financing laws and the regulation of speech associated with terrorism while failing to agree on a definition of terrorism or the importance of repecting human rights while combating terrorism. It assesses some failures and challenges of counter-terrorism.
