Selling the war on terror : foreign policy discourses after 9/11 / Jack Holland.
Material type:
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9780415519755 (hbk)
- JZ1253.5 H65 2013
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | JZ1253.5 H65 2013 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010011318160 | ||
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | JZ1253.5 H65 2013 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | C.2 | Available | 30010011318161 |
Browsing UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات shelves, Shelving location: General Collection | المجموعات العامة Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
JZ1253.5 H355 2011 Shocked and awed : how the war on terror and Jihad have changed the English language / | JZ1253.5 H36 2006 Security as practice : discourse analysis and the Bosnian war / | JZ1253.5 H36 2006 Security as practice : discourse analysis and the Bosnian war / | JZ1253.5 H65 2013 Selling the war on terror : foreign policy discourses after 9/11 / | JZ1253.5 H65 2013 Selling the war on terror : foreign policy discourses after 9/11 / | JZ1253.5 M37 2011 Metaphors in international relations theory / | JZ1253.5 M37 2011 Metaphors in international relations theory / |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"This book uses a comparative analysis to examine foreign policy discourses and the dynamics of the 'War on Terror'. The book considers the three principal members of the Coalition of the Willing in Afghanistan and Iraq: the United States, Britain and Australia. Despite significant cultural, historical and political overlap, the War on Terror was nevertheless rendered possible in these contexts in distinct ways, drawing on different discourses and narratives of foreign policy and identity. This volume explores these differences and their origins, arguing that they have important implications for the way we understand foreign policy and political possibility. The author rejects prevalent interpretations of a War on Terror foreign policy discourse, in the singular, highlighting that coalition states both demonstrated and relied upon divergent policy framings to make the War on Terror possible. The book thus contributes to our understanding of political possibility, in the process correcting a tendency to view the War on Terror as a universal and monolithic political discourse. This book will be of much interest to students of foreign policy, critical security studies, terrorism studies, discourse analysis, and IR in general."--Provided by publisher.