عرض عادي

Logics of legitimacy : three traditions of public administration praxis / Margaret Stout.

بواسطة:نوع المادة : نصنصالسلاسل:Public administration and public policy ; 168.الناشر:Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, [2013]تاريخ حقوق النشر: copyright 2013وصف:xix, 305 pages ; 24 cmنوع المحتوى:
  • text
نوع الوسائط:
  • unmediated
نوع الناقل:
  • volume
تدمك:
  • 9781466511613
  • 1466511613
الموضوع:تصنيف مكتبة الكونجرس:
  • JF1351 S85 2013
المحتويات:
The legitimacy question -- Why worry about role conceptualization? Professional socialization in public administration -- Using theoretical frameworks as interpretive lenses -- How the traditions framework was created -- The generic elements of each tradition -- The constitutional tradition: bureaucratic accountability of the constitutional order -- The discretionary tradition: entrepreneurial responsibility for desirable outcomes -- The collaborative tradition: stewardship responsiveness to the citizenry -- Mutual critiques among traditions -- Integrations, conciliations, and dialectical syntheses -- Assessing contextual fit of the traditions : a mental experiment -- Appendix : foundations course outline.
ملخص:"The discipline of public administration draws predominantly from political and organizational theory, but also from other social and behavioral sciences, philosophy, and even theology. This diversity results in conflicting prescriptions for the 'proper' administrative role. So, how are those new to public administration to know which ideas are 'legitimate'? Rather than accepting conventional arguments for administrative legitimacy through delegated constitutional authority or expertise, [this book] does not assume that any one approach to professionalism is accepted by all scholars, practitioners, citizens, or elected representatives. Instead, it offers a framework for public administration theory and practice that fully includes the citizen as a political actor alongside elected representatives and administrators. This framework considers both direct and representative forms of democracy; examines concepts from both political and organizational theory, addressing many of the key questions in public administration; examines past and present approaches to administration; presents a conceptual lens for understanding public administration theory and explaining different administrative roles and practices. The framework for public administration theory and practice is presented in three traditions of main prescriptions for practice: Constitutional (the bureaucrat), Discretionary (the entrepreneur), and Collaborative (the steward)"--Publisher description.
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية رقم الطلب رقم النسخة حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة JF1351 S85 2013 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) C.1 Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط 30010011318305
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة JF1351 S85 2013 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) C.2 المتاح 30010011318304

Includes bibliographical references (pages 253-285) and index.

The legitimacy question -- Why worry about role conceptualization? Professional socialization in public administration -- Using theoretical frameworks as interpretive lenses -- How the traditions framework was created -- The generic elements of each tradition -- The constitutional tradition: bureaucratic accountability of the constitutional order -- The discretionary tradition: entrepreneurial responsibility for desirable outcomes -- The collaborative tradition: stewardship responsiveness to the citizenry -- Mutual critiques among traditions -- Integrations, conciliations, and dialectical syntheses -- Assessing contextual fit of the traditions : a mental experiment -- Appendix : foundations course outline.

"The discipline of public administration draws predominantly from political and organizational theory, but also from other social and behavioral sciences, philosophy, and even theology. This diversity results in conflicting prescriptions for the 'proper' administrative role. So, how are those new to public administration to know which ideas are 'legitimate'? Rather than accepting conventional arguments for administrative legitimacy through delegated constitutional authority or expertise, [this book] does not assume that any one approach to professionalism is accepted by all scholars, practitioners, citizens, or elected representatives. Instead, it offers a framework for public administration theory and practice that fully includes the citizen as a political actor alongside elected representatives and administrators. This framework considers both direct and representative forms of democracy; examines concepts from both political and organizational theory, addressing many of the key questions in public administration; examines past and present approaches to administration; presents a conceptual lens for understanding public administration theory and explaining different administrative roles and practices. The framework for public administration theory and practice is presented in three traditions of main prescriptions for practice: Constitutional (the bureaucrat), Discretionary (the entrepreneur), and Collaborative (the steward)"--Publisher description.

شارك

أبوظبي، الإمارات العربية المتحدة

reference@ecssr.ae

97124044780 +

حقوق النشر © 2024 مركز الإمارات للدراسات والبحوث الاستراتيجية جميع الحقوق محفوظة