عرض عادي

The power triangle : military, security, and politics in regime change / Hazem Kandil.

بواسطة:نوع المادة : نصنصالناشر:New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2016وصف:xiii, 403 pages ; 25 cmنوع المحتوى:
  • text
نوع الوسائط:
  • unmediated
نوع الناقل:
  • volume
تدمك:
  • 9780190239206
  • 0190239204
الموضوع:تصنيف مكتبة الكونجرس:
  • JC489 .K36 2016
المحتويات:
PART I IRAN. ROYALISM AND REVOLUTION -- 1. A One-Man Coup: February 1921, pages35 -- 2. A Coup de Theatre: August 1953, pages43 -- 3. The Road to Persepolis and Back: August 1953-January 1978, pages56 -- 4. The Coup That Never Was: January 1979, pages84 -- 5. Checks and Balances: The Realist Version: February 1979 and After, pages108 -- PART II. TURKEY: THE LIMITS OF MILITARY GUARDIANSHIP -- 6. The Founding Coup: March 1924, pages143 -- 7. The Corrective Coup: May 1960, pages158 -- 8. The Cornmunique Coup: March 1971, pages169 -- 9. The Passive Revolution: September 1980, pages173 -- 10. The White Coup: June 1997, pages180 -- 11. Aborted Coups? November 2002 and After, pages192 -- PART III. EGYPT: THE POLITICS OF REPRESSION -- 12. Militarism and Its Discontents: March 1954, pages231 -- 13. Blood, Folly, and Sandcastles: June 1967, pages247 -- 14. Becoming a Police State: October 1973, pages267 -- 15. The Long Road to a Short Revolution: October 1981-January 2011, pages303 -- 16. The Resilience of Repression: January 2011 and After, pages322 -- Conclusion: Revolution, Reform, and Resilience, pages362.
ملخص:Iran, Egypt, and Turkey all experienced remarkably similar coup-installed regimes in the middle of the twentieth century, and shared comparable state-building ambitions. Despite these similarities, each followed a different trajectory: Iran became an absolutist monarchy that was overthrown from below; Turkey evolved into a limited democracy; and Egypt metamorphosed into a police state. What accounts for this divergence? In The Power Triangle, Hazem Kandil attributes the different outcomes to the power struggle between the political, military, and security components of each regime. Following a coup, officers immediately divide their labor: one group runs government, another supervises the military, and the third handles security. Their interests initially overlap, but begin to vary as each group becomes identified with its own institution. The politicians wish to remain in power indefinitely, but need the support of the custodians of violence; military officers prefer to withdraw from politics after implementing the needed reforms, since their prerogatives are usually guaranteed regardless of regime type, and politicization corrupts the corps; and security men strive to consolidate authoritarianism in order to maintain the inflated privileges they have acquired during the emergency period following the coup. Driven by conflicting agendas, the three partners struggle to control the regime. Through comparative historical analysis, Kandil demonstrates that the new regime is shaped and reshaped through the recurrent clashes and changing alliances between the team of rivals in this 'power triangle.' Bringing realism into domestic politics, The Power Triangle demonstrates that we cannot gain a clear understanding of pivotal events in Iran, Egypt, and Turkey without a firm grasp of the balance of power within the ruling bloc of each country.-- Provided by Publisher.
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية رقم الطلب رقم النسخة حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة JC489 .K36 2016 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) C.1 Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط 30020000032918
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة JC489 .K36 2016 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) C.2 المتاح 30020000032919

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Iran, Egypt, and Turkey all experienced remarkably similar coup-installed regimes in the middle of the twentieth century, and shared comparable state-building ambitions. Despite these similarities, each followed a different trajectory: Iran became an absolutist monarchy that was overthrown from below; Turkey evolved into a limited democracy; and Egypt metamorphosed into a police state. What accounts for this divergence? In The Power Triangle, Hazem Kandil attributes the different outcomes to the power struggle between the political, military, and security components of each regime. Following a coup, officers immediately divide their labor: one group runs government, another supervises the military, and the third handles security. Their interests initially overlap, but begin to vary as each group becomes identified with its own institution. The politicians wish to remain in power indefinitely, but need the support of the custodians of violence; military officers prefer to withdraw from politics after implementing the needed reforms, since their prerogatives are usually guaranteed regardless of regime type, and politicization corrupts the corps; and security men strive to consolidate authoritarianism in order to maintain the inflated privileges they have acquired during the emergency period following the coup. Driven by conflicting agendas, the three partners struggle to control the regime. Through comparative historical analysis, Kandil demonstrates that the new regime is shaped and reshaped through the recurrent clashes and changing alliances between the team of rivals in this 'power triangle.' Bringing realism into domestic politics, The Power Triangle demonstrates that we cannot gain a clear understanding of pivotal events in Iran, Egypt, and Turkey without a firm grasp of the balance of power within the ruling bloc of each country.-- Provided by Publisher.

PART I IRAN. ROYALISM AND REVOLUTION -- 1. A One-Man Coup: February 1921, pages35 -- 2. A Coup de Theatre: August 1953, pages43 -- 3. The Road to Persepolis and Back: August 1953-January 1978, pages56 -- 4. The Coup That Never Was: January 1979, pages84 -- 5. Checks and Balances: The Realist Version: February 1979 and After, pages108 -- PART II. TURKEY: THE LIMITS OF MILITARY GUARDIANSHIP -- 6. The Founding Coup: March 1924, pages143 -- 7. The Corrective Coup: May 1960, pages158 -- 8. The Cornmunique Coup: March 1971, pages169 -- 9. The Passive Revolution: September 1980, pages173 -- 10. The White Coup: June 1997, pages180 -- 11. Aborted Coups? November 2002 and After, pages192 -- PART III. EGYPT: THE POLITICS OF REPRESSION -- 12. Militarism and Its Discontents: March 1954, pages231 -- 13. Blood, Folly, and Sandcastles: June 1967, pages247 -- 14. Becoming a Police State: October 1973, pages267 -- 15. The Long Road to a Short Revolution: October 1981-January 2011, pages303 -- 16. The Resilience of Repression: January 2011 and After, pages322 -- Conclusion: Revolution, Reform, and Resilience, pages362.

شارك

أبوظبي، الإمارات العربية المتحدة

reference@ecssr.ae

97124044780 +

حقوق النشر © 2024 مركز الإمارات للدراسات والبحوث الاستراتيجية جميع الحقوق محفوظة