صورة الغلاف المحلية
صورة الغلاف المحلية
عرض عادي

The remote revolution : Drones and modern statecraft / Erik Lin-Greenberg.

بواسطة:نوع المادة : ملف الحاسوبملف الحاسوباللغة: الإنجليزية السلاسل:Cornell Studies in Security Affairs Seriesالناشر:Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2025تاريخ حقوق النشر: ©2025الطبعات:1st edوصف:1 online resource (275 pages)نوع المحتوى:
  • text
نوع الوسائط:
  • computer
نوع الناقل:
  • online resource
تدمك:
  • 9781501783845
الموضوع:النوع/الشكل:تنسيقات مادية إضافية:Print version:: The Remote Revolutionموارد على الانترنت:
المحتويات:
Introduction.
Chapter 1: The Remote Revolution.
Chapter 2: Evidence from Wargames.
Chapter 3: Evidence from Surveys.
Chapter 4: US Cold War Aerial Reconnaissance.
Chapter 5: Israel’s Drone Use and the Campaign Between Wars.
Conclusion.
Appendix A: Increased Incidence Follow-On Wargame.
Appendix B: Follow-On Survey Experiment.
Appendix C: Additional Data from Survey Experiments.
ملخص:Cowinner of the APSA Conflict Processes Section Book Award In The Remote Revolution Erik Lin-Greenberg shows that drones are rewriting the rules of international security--but not in ways one would expect. Emerging technologies like drones are often believed to increase the likelihood of crises and war. By lowering the potential risks and human costs of military operations, they encourage decision-makers to deploy military force. Yet as Lin-Greenberg contends, operations involving drones are in fact less likely to evolve into broader, more intense conflicts than similar operations involving traditionally crewed assets. Even as drones increase the frequency of conflict, the decreased costs of their operations reduces the likelihood of conflict escalation. Leveraging diverse types of evidence from original wargames, survey experiments, and cases of US and Israeli drone operations, Lin-Greenberg explores how drone operations lower risks of escalation. First, they enable states to gather more or better intelligence that may avert or reduce the chances of high-stakes conflict. Second, drone attacks are less likely to affront a target state's honor and therefore less likely to provoke aggressive responses. Lastly, leaders are less likely to take escalatory actions when drones are attacked than they are with incidents involving inhabited assets. Lin-Greenberg's findings prove conclusively that drones are far less destabilizing than commonly argued. Drones add rungs to the proverbial "escalation ladder" and, in doing so, have brought about a fundamental change--a revolution--in the character of statecraft. With the use of unmanned technologies only set to grow in coming times, The Remote Revolution is critical reading about their possibilities and politics.
قوائم هذه المادة تظهر في: Electronic Books | الكتب الإلكترونية
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية رقم الطلب رابط URL حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود حجوزات مادة
مصدر رقمي مصدر رقمي UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات Online Copy | نسخة إلكترونية رابط إلى المورد لا يعار
إجمالي الحجوزات: 0

Introduction.

Chapter 1: The Remote Revolution.

Chapter 2: Evidence from Wargames.

Chapter 3: Evidence from Surveys.

Chapter 4: US Cold War Aerial Reconnaissance.

Chapter 5: Israel’s Drone Use and the Campaign Between Wars.

Conclusion.

Appendix A: Increased Incidence Follow-On Wargame.

Appendix B: Follow-On Survey Experiment.

Appendix C: Additional Data from Survey Experiments.

Cowinner of the APSA Conflict Processes Section Book Award In The Remote Revolution Erik Lin-Greenberg shows that drones are rewriting the rules of international security--but not in ways one would expect. Emerging technologies like drones are often believed to increase the likelihood of crises and war. By lowering the potential risks and human costs of military operations, they encourage decision-makers to deploy military force. Yet as Lin-Greenberg contends, operations involving drones are in fact less likely to evolve into broader, more intense conflicts than similar operations involving traditionally crewed assets. Even as drones increase the frequency of conflict, the decreased costs of their operations reduces the likelihood of conflict escalation. Leveraging diverse types of evidence from original wargames, survey experiments, and cases of US and Israeli drone operations, Lin-Greenberg explores how drone operations lower risks of escalation. First, they enable states to gather more or better intelligence that may avert or reduce the chances of high-stakes conflict. Second, drone attacks are less likely to affront a target state's honor and therefore less likely to provoke aggressive responses. Lastly, leaders are less likely to take escalatory actions when drones are attacked than they are with incidents involving inhabited assets. Lin-Greenberg's findings prove conclusively that drones are far less destabilizing than commonly argued. Drones add rungs to the proverbial "escalation ladder" and, in doing so, have brought about a fundamental change--a revolution--in the character of statecraft. With the use of unmanned technologies only set to grow in coming times, The Remote Revolution is critical reading about their possibilities and politics.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

اضغط على الصورة لمشاهدتها في عارض الصور

صورة الغلاف المحلية
شارك

أبوظبي، الإمارات العربية المتحدة

reference@ecssr.ae

الملاحظات والمقترحات: library_feedback@ecssr.ae

97124044780 +

حقوق النشر © 2026 مركز الإمارات للدراسات والبحوث الاستراتيجية جميع الحقوق محفوظة