عرض عادي

Removal of the property qualification for voting in the United States : strategy and suffrage / Justin Moeller and Ronald F. King.

بواسطة:المساهم (المساهمين):نوع المادة : نصنصاللغة: الإنجليزية السلاسل:Routledge research in American politics and governance ; 23الناشر:New York, NY : Routledge, 2019وصف:136 pages ; 24 cmنوع المحتوى:
  • text
نوع الوسائط:
  • unmediated
نوع الناقل:
  • volume
تدمك:
  • 9781138726949
الموضوع:تصنيف مكتبة الكونجرس:
  • JK96.A3 M64 2019
المحتويات:
Property, participation, and the routes to reform -- The politics of partisan preemption : Pennsylvania, Georgia, and New Hampshire -- The politics of partisan cooptation : Delaware, South Carolina, Massachusetts, and Virginia -- The politics of partisan replacement : Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina -- The politics of partisan rejection : Rhode Island -- Strategic incentives and franchise reform : an event history analysis -- The expansion and contraction of democratic rights.
ملخص:"In colonial America, democracy was centered in provincial assemblies, and based on the collection of neighbors whose freehold ownership made them permanent stakeholders in the community. The removal of the property qualification for voting in the United States occurred over three-quarters of a century and was among the more important events in the history of democratization, helping to shift voting from a corporate privilege to a human right. There are standard histories that trace the path of property qualification removal, both broadly over time and within each individual state. In this book, Justin Moeller and Ronald F. King adopt the theories and methods of formal analysis to discover patterns and regularities across historic cases, to attempt a more systematic understanding of the subject. While no social event has a single cause, party consolidation and partisan competition provided a necessary mechanism to background factors and make them politically relevant. Moeller and King argue that political parties used or rejected franchise rule reform strategically as a means of advancing their electoral position. This factor significantly helps to explain both temporal differences across states and the pattern of contestation within each state individually"-- Provided by publisher.
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية رقم الطلب رقم النسخة حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة JK96.A3 M64 2019 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) C.1 Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط 30020000054019
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة JK96.A3 M64 2019 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) C.2 المتاح 30020000053878

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Property, participation, and the routes to reform -- The politics of partisan preemption : Pennsylvania, Georgia, and New Hampshire -- The politics of partisan cooptation : Delaware, South Carolina, Massachusetts, and Virginia -- The politics of partisan replacement : Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina -- The politics of partisan rejection : Rhode Island -- Strategic incentives and franchise reform : an event history analysis -- The expansion and contraction of democratic rights.

"In colonial America, democracy was centered in provincial assemblies, and based on the collection of neighbors whose freehold ownership made them permanent stakeholders in the community. The removal of the property qualification for voting in the United States occurred over three-quarters of a century and was among the more important events in the history of democratization, helping to shift voting from a corporate privilege to a human right. There are standard histories that trace the path of property qualification removal, both broadly over time and within each individual state. In this book, Justin Moeller and Ronald F. King adopt the theories and methods of formal analysis to discover patterns and regularities across historic cases, to attempt a more systematic understanding of the subject. While no social event has a single cause, party consolidation and partisan competition provided a necessary mechanism to background factors and make them politically relevant. Moeller and King argue that political parties used or rejected franchise rule reform strategically as a means of advancing their electoral position. This factor significantly helps to explain both temporal differences across states and the pattern of contestation within each state individually"-- Provided by publisher.

شارك

أبوظبي، الإمارات العربية المتحدة

reference@ecssr.ae

97124044780 +

حقوق النشر © 2024 مركز الإمارات للدراسات والبحوث الاستراتيجية جميع الحقوق محفوظة