Henry Adams : the historian as political theorist / James P. Young.
نوع المادة :![نص](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0700610871 (HBK)
- E175.5.A2 Y68 2001
نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | E175.5.A2 Y68 2001 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000100410 | ||
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | E175.5.A2 Y68 2001 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.2 | المتاح | 30010000100409 |
Browsing UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات shelves, Shelving location: General Collection | المجموعات العامة إغلاق مستعرض الرف(يخفي مستعرض الرف)
E175 A454 2011 American history now / | E175 .B5712 1991 المسيحية و السيف : وثائق إبادة هنود القارة الأمريكية على أيدي المسيحين الأسبان : رواية شاهد عيان / | E175.5.A2 Y68 2001 Henry Adams : the historian as political theorist / | E175.5.A2 Y68 2001 Henry Adams : the historian as political theorist / | E175.5.B66 H87 2012 Herbert Eugene Bolton : historian of the American borderlands / | E175.5.B66 H87 2012 Herbert Eugene Bolton : historian of the American borderlands / | E175.7 .K54 2011 From history to theory / |
In this volume James P. Young seeks to revive interest in the thought ofHenry Adams by extracting core ideas from his writings concerning both Americanpolitical development and the course of world history and then showing their relevance to the contemporary longing for a democratic revival. In this revisionist study, Young denies that Adams was a reactionary critic of democracy and instead contends that he was an idealistic advocate of representative government. Young focuses on Adams's belief that capitalist industrial development during the Gilded Age had debased American ideals and then turns to a careful study of Adams's famous contrast of the unity of medieval society with the fragmentation of modern technological society. Though fully aware of Adams's concerns about technology, Young rejects the idea that Adams was bitterly opposed to twentieth centurydevelopments in that field. He shows that though a liberal democrat with inclinations toward reform, Adams is much too sophisticated to be captured bya