Assessing research : the researchers' view / Steven Wooding, Jonathan Grant.
نوع المادة :
نصالناشر:Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2003. 2003وصف:2 volume : illustrations, map ; 28 cmنوع المحتوى:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0833034804 (V. 1 pbk)
- 0833034790 (V. 2 pbk)
- Q180.G7 W66 2003
| نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | معلومات المجلد | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
كتاب
|
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | Q180.G7 W66 2003 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | v.1 | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000144400 | ||
|
كتاب
|
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | Q180.G7 W66 2003 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | v.2 | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000143621 |
Browsing UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات shelves, Shelving location: General Collection | المجموعات العامة إغلاق مستعرض الرف(يخفي مستعرض الرف)
| Q180.F7 C76 2018 Scientific institutions and practice in France and Britain, c.1700-c.1870 / | Q180.F7 C76 2018 Scientific institutions and practice in France and Britain, c.1700-c.1870 / | Q180.G4 M3 1993 Surviving the swastika : scientific research in Nazi Germany / | Q180.G7 W66 2003 Assessing research : the researchers' view / | Q180.G7 W66 2003 Assessing research : the researchers' view / | Q180.G8 R85 1993 العلم والتقانة بدول مجلس التعاون الخليجي : الواقع والخروج من المأزق / | Q180.G8 R85 1993 العلم والتقانة بدول مجلس التعاون الخليجي : الواقع والخروج من المأزق / |
"MR-1698-HEFCE"--P. [4] of cover.
"Prepared for the Higher Education Funding Council for England."
"RAND Europe."
Information on Participants -- Task 1 Results -- Task 2 Assessing the Four Basic Systems -- Hybrid Systems and their Implementation and Implications.
This report provided evidence for the review; it describes workshops that investigated the academic community's views of research quality and attitudes towards models of assessment. Nine facilitated workshops were held in December 2002, which involved 142 academics and research managers from throughout the UK. The report outlines the recurring themes and issues raised by the participants. Key findings were that the overwhelming majority of participants thought research should be assessed using a system based on peer review; that there was a strong desire for a system with clear rules and transparent procedures; and that there was a need for improved systems to assess inter- and multi-disciplinary research work.
