Justice and the media : reconciling fair trials and a free press / Matthew D. Bunker.
نوع المادة :![نص](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0805821686
- 0415516285 (pbk)
- 9780415516280 (pbk)
- KF9223.5 B86 2011
نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | KF9223.5 B86 2011 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010011079079 | ||
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | KF9223.5 B86 2011 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.2 | المتاح | 30010011079105 |
Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
1. Scrutinizing the Scrutiny Structure -- 2. The Supreme Court and First Amendment Scrutiny -- 3. Courts and Prejudicial Publicity -- 4. Prior Restraints -- 5. Postpublication Sanctions -- 6. Access to Proceedings -- 7. Defects in the System -- 8. A Proposal for a Categorical Solution.
The First Amendment right of free speech is a fragile one. Its fragility is found no less in legal opinions than in other, less specialized forms of public discourse. Both its fragility and its sometimes surprising resiliency are reflected in this book. It provides an examination of how the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt with the problem of restrictions on media coverage of the criminal justice system, as well as how lower courts have interpreted the law created by the Supreme Court. The author explores the degree to which the Court has created a coherent body of law that protects free expression values while permitting reasonable government regulation, and examines the Supreme Court's jurisprudence concerning prior restraints, post-publication sanctions on the press, and their right of access to criminal proceedings.--Provided by publisher.