Democracy in Postwar Japan : Maruyama Masao and the search for autonomy / Rikki Kersten.
نوع المادة : نصالسلاسل:Nissan Institute/Routledge Japanese studies seriesالناشر:London ; New York : Routledge, 1996وصف:xiv, 289 pages ; 23 cmنوع المحتوى:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0415117534
- JQ1681 K47 1996
نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
كتاب | UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | JQ1681 K47 1996 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000116891 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages [234]-286) and index.
1. Introduction -- 2. Defeat and democracy in postwar Japan: The war responsibility debate -- 3. The search for autonomy: Maruyama Masao and the Japanese past -- 4. Maruyama, Marx and the shutaisei debate -- 5. Modernisation: the acquisition of autonomy -- 6. Fascism: the antithesis of democracy -- 7. Pacifism, autonomy and the logic of democracy -- 8. Democracy in crisis: the security treaty crisis of 1960 -- 9. Conclusion -- Maruyama Masao: critical Bibliography.
It is often assumed that Japan passively accepted the Western notion of democracy imposed during the postwar Occupation. Rikki Kersten argues that in fact democracy was the subject of fierce debate in Japan. War and Occupation prompted critical re-evaluation of Japanese political identity; it also catalysed an appraisal of the workings of democracy. Rikki Kersten explores the debate through the writings of a man in the thick of this intellectual ferment: Maruyama Masao.
Maruyama, credited with the establishment of the discipline of political science in Japan, defined democracy through the notion of personal autonomy - maintaining the distinction between the public and private realms - and social autonomy - allowing public engagement with the political sphere. The tensions between personal and social autonomy formed the kernel of postwar Japanese political culture.
Following the Security Treaty crisis of 1960, and disappointed with the failure of autonomy to emerge as a significant force in Japanese political life, Maruyama retired from the democracy debate. He nonetheless remains an intensely controversial figure. Political thinkers even now make their mark by lauding or denouncing the work of Maruyama Masao. Democracy in Postwar Japan reveals the importance of the contribution made to democratic thought by Maruyama.
It also sheds light on contemporary criticisms of Japan's political system.