عرض عادي

Assessing research : the researchers' view / Steven Wooding, Jonathan Grant.

بواسطة:المساهم (المساهمين):نوع المادة : نصنصالناشر:Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2003. 2003وصف:2 volume : illustrations, map ; 28 cmنوع المحتوى:
  • text
نوع الوسائط:
  • unmediated
نوع الناقل:
  • volume
تدمك:
  • 0833034804 (V. 1 pbk)
  • 0833034790 (V. 2 pbk)
الموضوع:تصنيف مكتبة الكونجرس:
  • Q180.G7 W66 2003
موارد على الانترنت:
المحتويات:
Information on Participants -- Task 1 Results -- Task 2 Assessing the Four Basic Systems -- Hybrid Systems and their Implementation and Implications.
ملخص:This report provided evidence for the review; it describes workshops that investigated the academic community's views of research quality and attitudes towards models of assessment. Nine facilitated workshops were held in December 2002, which involved 142 academics and research managers from throughout the UK. The report outlines the recurring themes and issues raised by the participants. Key findings were that the overwhelming majority of participants thought research should be assessed using a system based on peer review; that there was a strong desire for a system with clear rules and transparent procedures; and that there was a need for improved systems to assess inter- and multi-disciplinary research work.
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية رقم الطلب معلومات المجلد رقم النسخة حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة Q180.G7 W66 2003 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) v.1 C.1 Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط 30010000144400
كتاب كتاب UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة Q180.G7 W66 2003 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) v.2 C.1 Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط 30010000143621

"MR-1698-HEFCE"--P. [4] of cover.

"Prepared for the Higher Education Funding Council for England."

"RAND Europe."

Information on Participants -- Task 1 Results -- Task 2 Assessing the Four Basic Systems -- Hybrid Systems and their Implementation and Implications.

This report provided evidence for the review; it describes workshops that investigated the academic community's views of research quality and attitudes towards models of assessment. Nine facilitated workshops were held in December 2002, which involved 142 academics and research managers from throughout the UK. The report outlines the recurring themes and issues raised by the participants. Key findings were that the overwhelming majority of participants thought research should be assessed using a system based on peer review; that there was a strong desire for a system with clear rules and transparent procedures; and that there was a need for improved systems to assess inter- and multi-disciplinary research work.

شارك

أبوظبي، الإمارات العربية المتحدة

reference@ecssr.ae

97124044780 +

حقوق النشر © 2024 مركز الإمارات للدراسات والبحوث الاستراتيجية جميع الحقوق محفوظة