An assessment of technical issues raised in R.W. Haley's critique of three studies of health effects of the Gulf War / Gus Haggstrom.
نوع المادة :![نص](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0833027522 (pbk)
- RB152.7 H34 2000
- Also available in electronic form via the RAND Corporation Web site.
نوع المادة | المكتبة الحالية | رقم الطلب | رقم النسخة | حالة | تاريخ الإستحقاق | الباركود | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة | RB152.7 H34 2000 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) | C.1 | Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط | 30010000250157 |
Browsing UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات shelves, Shelving location: General Collection | المجموعات العامة إغلاق مستعرض الرف(يخفي مستعرض الرف)
"MR-1078-OSD."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 15).
In a 1998 article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology and in a reply to counterpoints by the original authors of the studies, R.W. Haley challenged the validity of three government-sponsored studies that found no increased risk of adverse health effects in American veterans of Operation Desert Storm and Operation Desert Shield. This report examines the statistical methods used by the authors of the original studies and Haley's charges of statistical "bias" and concludes that the earlier studies were scientifically valid.
Also available in electronic form via the RAND Corporation Web site.