Normal view

Maritime prepositioning force (future) capability assessment : planned and alternative structures / Robert W. Button ... [and others].

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Rand Corporation monograph seriesPublisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2010Description: xxi, 79 pages : color illustrations ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9780833049506 (pbk)
  • 083304950X (pbk)
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • VA69 M18 2010
Online resources:
Contents:
Introduction and objectives -- Operational concepts and scenarios -- Major combat operations -- Counterinsurgency operations -- The MPF(F) as a Joint Special Operations Task Force Afloat Forward Staging Base -- Conclusions -- Appendix A: Additional cases -- Appendix B: Maritime prepositioning force (future) description -- Appendix C: MPF(F) MEB sustainment requirements -- Appendix D: Model description.
Summary: Navy and Marine Corps Sea Basing concepts envision the development of capabilities that will allow the rapid deployment, assembly, command, projection, reconstitution, and re-employment of expeditionary forces from the sea. The RAND Corporation assessed alternative structures for the proposed Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), or MPF(F), squadron and how these changes would affect abilities to support a Marine Expeditionary Brigade (MEB) in operations ranging from counterinsurgency to special operations to major combat operations. This assessment of the capabilities of alternative structures for the MPF(F) considers the need for both logistics support and casualty evacuation and care in assessing MPF(F) capabilities. Most of the variations considered entail removing large-deck ships from the squadron. RAND researchers also explored the possibility of an MPF(F) construct where only surface connectors, and no aircraft, could be used for supporting a MEB. The researchers found that degradation to logistics throughput resulting from eliminating large-deck ships from the MPF(F) could be offset by substituting CH-53K helicopters for MV-22s, with air connectors from other ships also helping provide adequate throughput capacity. Although eliminating all large-deck ships would also eliminate major medical capabilities, the squadron would otherwise retain the ability to provide logistics support for a full range of major combat, counterinsurgency, and special operations.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book Book UAE Federation Library | مكتبة اتحاد الإمارات General Collection | المجموعات العامة VA69 M18 2010 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) C.1 Library Use Only | داخل المكتبة فقط 30010000396055
Total holds: 0

"RAND National Defense Research Institute."

"This research was ... conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute"--Pref.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 77-79).

Introduction and objectives -- Operational concepts and scenarios -- Major combat operations -- Counterinsurgency operations -- The MPF(F) as a Joint Special Operations Task Force Afloat Forward Staging Base -- Conclusions -- Appendix A: Additional cases -- Appendix B: Maritime prepositioning force (future) description -- Appendix C: MPF(F) MEB sustainment requirements -- Appendix D: Model description.

Navy and Marine Corps Sea Basing concepts envision the development of capabilities that will allow the rapid deployment, assembly, command, projection, reconstitution, and re-employment of expeditionary forces from the sea. The RAND Corporation assessed alternative structures for the proposed Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), or MPF(F), squadron and how these changes would affect abilities to support a Marine Expeditionary Brigade (MEB) in operations ranging from counterinsurgency to special operations to major combat operations. This assessment of the capabilities of alternative structures for the MPF(F) considers the need for both logistics support and casualty evacuation and care in assessing MPF(F) capabilities. Most of the variations considered entail removing large-deck ships from the squadron. RAND researchers also explored the possibility of an MPF(F) construct where only surface connectors, and no aircraft, could be used for supporting a MEB. The researchers found that degradation to logistics throughput resulting from eliminating large-deck ships from the MPF(F) could be offset by substituting CH-53K helicopters for MV-22s, with air connectors from other ships also helping provide adequate throughput capacity. Although eliminating all large-deck ships would also eliminate major medical capabilities, the squadron would otherwise retain the ability to provide logistics support for a full range of major combat, counterinsurgency, and special operations.

Share

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

reference@ecssr.ae

+97124044780

Copyright © 2026 Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research All Rights Reserved